Intellectual Property Firm
“Companies across the world have come to depend on Matthias Scholl for developing & protecting their intellectual property assets.”
Overview
Matthias Scholl is a law firm focused exclusively on intellectual property law, with particular emphasis on patent and trademark prosecution.
We advance our clients’ interests through careful legal analysis, innovative problem-solving, and dedicated representation. Our work is guided by a strong commitment to quality, practical judgment, and responsiveness. This approach reflects our genuine focus on our clients’ objectives and has resulted in long-standing client relationships and referrals worldwide.
Realizing advanced technology®
Founder
Dr. Matthias Scholl is the founder and administrative head of the firm.
Dr. Scholl’s academic background includes:
- Doctor of Laws (J.D.), Harvard Law School
- Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) in Organic Chemistry, California Institute of Technology, for work contributing to research recognized by the 2005 Nobel Prize in Chemistry awarded to Prof. Robert H. Grubbs
- Doctor of Medicine (M.D.), International University of the Health Sciences
- Three Bachelor of Science (S.B.) degrees from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, with a triple major in chemistry, chemical engineering, and foreign languages and literatures
Dr. Scholl is a registered patent attorney admitted to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. He is also admitted to the Massachusetts Bar and to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Patent Metrics
1623
Granted U.S. Patents
586
Clients Worldwide
132
Patents for Largest Client
2.54
Average Patents per Client
2001-03-15
Earliest Filing Date
2006-03-21
Earliest Issue Date
2026-08-25
Most Recent Issue Date
4.37
Fastest Pendency (months)
27.10
Average Pendency (months)
Top Patent Classes
- H02K - DYNAMO-ELECTRIC MACHINES
- A24F - SMOKERS’ REQUISITES; MATCH BOXES; SIMULATED SMOKING DEVICES
- H02P - CONTROL OR REGULATION OF ELECTRIC MOTORS, ELECTRIC GENERATORS OR DYNAMO-ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; CONTROLLING TRANSFORMERS, REACTORS OR CHOKE COILS
- G01N - INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- A61K - PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- C02F - TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- F04D - NON-POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT PUMPS
- B01J - CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01D - SEPARATION
Latest News
Biofer S.P.A. v. Vifor (International) AG (Fed Cir. 2026)
By Kevin E. Noonan – Measurement of the hydrogen ion concentration in an aqueous solution is represented (on a logarithmic scale) as the pH, wherein water under ambient conditions (a temperature of ...
Read Full ArticleHuawei Ripped Off Amazon Cloud Platform IP, Jury Hears
A former engineer for a U.S. subsidiary of Huawei on Thursday testified that she was shocked and upset after a colleague boasted of co-opting patented code used in Amazon's cloud computing platform, t...
Read Full ArticleThomson Reuters Says DOJ AI Stance Doesn't Back Ross
Thomson Reuters told the Third Circuit Thursday in defunct legal tech startup Ross Intelligence's interlocutory appeal of a summary judgment ruling that it infringed Westlaw headnotes that a statement...
Read Full ArticleExpedia Must Face Copyright Claims Over Car Photos
A Washington federal judge on Thursday denied a request from Expedia to exit a copyright infringement suit brought by EVOX Productions LLC claiming the travel booking website made unauthorized use of ...
Read Full ArticleClinical Trial Buyer Says Ex-Owner Breached $100M Deal
Surge ECN Holdings LLC and ECN Operating LLC have accused the former owner of a clinical trial research network of violating a five-year noncompete and other restrictions tied to a deal worth more tha...
Read Full ArticleCellspin Media Patent Suit Should Proceed, Judge Says
A Texas federal magistrate judge said Wednesday the court should not throw out Cellspin Soft Inc.'s patent lawsuit against Fossil Stores I Inc. over systems that can automatically publish social media...
Read Full ArticleFederal Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Pro Se Inventor’s Patent Term Adjustment Suit as Untimely
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a decision today in Guymon v. Squires, affirming a decision from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia dismissing...
Read Full ArticleDrone Co., Ex-VP Reach Deal Resolving Pay, Sabotage Claims
A company that makes emergency response drones and its former vice president of sales have settled a dispute in which the executive alleged he was stiffed on pay and the company accused him of trying ...
Read Full ArticlePTAB Axes Claims In Ex-Intel Chip Patent In Win For Arm
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has found that British semiconductor maker Arm Ltd. showed that all the challenged claims of a chip patent owned by patent licensing company Daedalus Prime are invali...
Read Full ArticleApple Watch Ban In Masimo ITC Patent Case Hits High Court
Apple Inc. has told the U.S. Supreme Court that the Federal Circuit improperly "lowered the bar" for meeting the U.S. International Trade Commission's domestic industry requirement in patent disputes,...
Read Full ArticleBiosimilars Boast Big Savings But Face IP Risks, Report Says
There are no biosimilar drugs in development for 90% of biologic products set to lose their patent exclusivity by 2034, according to a report released Thursday by the Association for Accessible Medici...
Read Full ArticleSquires Grants 10 Patent Reviews, Rejects None
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Director John Squires has instituted 10 more Patent Trial and Appeal Board petitions, largely in the pharmaceutical space....
Read Full ArticleEchoStar Says Ex-VP Violated Noncompete In Move To Rival
A former executive vice president of EchoStar Corp. violated his noncompete agreement when he left his role at the company to take a COO position with a rival company just two weeks later, the telecom...
Read Full ArticleCannabis, Psychedelics Boom Raises IP Hurdles
Recent data regarding patent filing activity and litigation in the cannabis and psychedelics markets indicates that as commercial interest accelerates, the scope of publicly accessible prior art is al...
Read Full ArticleBaylor, Boston U. Near Deal Over Interlocking 'BU' Logo
Baylor University says it is moving toward a deal to end its lawsuit claiming that its trademark rights on an interlocking "BU" logo are being infringed by Boston University and that the Massachusetts...
Read Full ArticlePatent Declaratory Judgment Actions Are Back In Vogue
Companies facing threats of patent infringement lawsuits are increasingly embracing declaratory judgment actions, a trend attorneys attribute to two pro-patent-owner shifts: the low institution rate o...
Read Full ArticleJudge Won't Touch Verdict In Blood Collection Patent Case
A Delaware federal judge has denied a bid from medical equipment maker Kurin for a new trial after a jury found it owed Magnolia Medical $1.6 million for infringement of three patents covering blood c...
Read Full ArticleEx-Lighting Co. Workers Must Face Trade Secret Suit
Three former employees of a lighting company lost a bid to escape a suit alleging they conspired for years to encourage customers to use products supplied by competing companies they operated, with a ...
Read Full ArticleThe Patent Estate Problem: Why Litigation Finance Is the Only Preservation Tool American Inventors Actually Have
Congress and the courts have spent two decades treating patents as active weapons in an ongoing commercial fight. That framing misses what patents actually are to most of the people who own them: inhe...
Read Full ArticleTake or License: Can a Contract Cap Trade Secret Damages at a Royalty?
Versata v. Ford: trade secret law reaches a taker's gains, unlike patent law. Can a license cap that recovery at a royalty? Courts are split. Continue reading this post on Patently-O....
Read Full Article9th Circ. Calls Foul On Judge's NCAA Five-Year Rule Injunction
The NCAA's five-year eligibility limit may be a commercial rule subject to antitrust scrutiny, but a Nevada federal judge improperly blocked it to let a college baseball player keep playing with littl...
Read Full ArticleJuggling And Unicycling Make Me A Better Lawyer
Because I juggle (sometimes with fire) and ride the unicycle, friends and family used to joke that I should join the circus, but I pursued the practice of law instead and learned that my hobbies benef...
Read Full ArticleWhat Does a Patent Notice Letter Actually Require? Understanding ‘Actual Notice’
To prevent innocent individuals from being held liable while acting in good faith, the patent statute requires that patent owners put would-be infringers on notice of their intellectual property right...
Read Full ArticleFeds' NY RICO Case Against Huawei Packs A Punch, Jury Told
The Brooklyn federal jury in the landmark corporate criminal trial of Huawei on Wednesday heard a prosecutor say they'll have an insider's view of the company's vast criminal operations that relied on...
Read Full ArticleGenius Settles With Panda Ahead Of Sports Tech Patent Trial
Sports technology company Genius Sports Ltd. and Panda Interactive have agreed to settle a patent dispute over technology that allows viewers to see real-time odds and place a bet while watching a spo...
Read Full ArticleWho Keeps the Skill: A Randomized Trial of AI Patent Drafting at Eleven Firms
A randomized trial gave 133 patent lawyers an AI drafting assistant for 90 days. Drafts improved, but only senior lawyers kept the gain without it. Continue reading this post on Patently-O....
Read Full ArticleBack to Vail: The IP CLE Conference, January 6-9, 2027
Dennis Crouch previews the January 6-9, 2027 IP CLE Conference at Grand Hyatt Vail, including the patent, PTAB, and AI sessions. Continue reading this post on Patently-O....
Read Full ArticleWill AI Data Centers Become the Next Patent Battleground? | IPWatchdog Unleashed
This week on IPWatchdog Unleashed, I spoke with Hilary Preston. Our conversation focused on the rapidly expanding AI data center ecosystem and the technology, infrastructure, and intellectual property...
Read Full ArticleChina Outshines U.S. With More Top Innovation Clusters in WIPO Global Innovation Index
Yesterday, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) released its 2026 Global Innovation Index (GII) identifying metropolitan clusters around the world seeing the highest levels of innovatio...
Read Full ArticleARIPO vs. OAPI: What U.S. Companies Need to Know Before Building an Africa IP Strategy
Every year, U.S. companies expanding into Africa make the same planning mistake: they treat the continent as though it has one intellectual property system. It has two, and choosing the wrong one, or ...
Read Full ArticleCAFC Affirms Fee Award Over Deficient Patent Pre-Suit Investigation
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a decision today in Viavi Solutions Inc. v. Platinum Optics Technology Inc., affirming a Northern District of California ruling that awa...
Read Full ArticleIt’s Down There Somewhere: Viavi’s Section 285 Fee Award Affirmed
The Federal Circuit affirms a Section 285 fee award against Viavi: no rule requires reverse engineering, but the accused phones were easy to buy. Continue reading this post on Patently-O....
Read Full ArticleSmucker’s Survives Motion to Dismiss: What the Uncrustables Trade Dress Fight Means for the Private Label Economy
On September 1, a federal judge in the Northern District of Ohio J.M. Smucker Co.‘s trademark and trade dress claims over its crustless, crimped-edge peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. The ruling a...
Read Full ArticleCorrecting the Uncorrectable: AI-Assisted Inventorship and Section 256
Under 35 U.S.C. Section 256, one can only correct an inventorship error when the underlying facts and the affected parties can actually be identified, and when the statutory correction procedure can b...
Read Full ArticleCAFC Oral Args
preview of four patent cases with oral arguments before the federal circuit on Sept 8, 2026. Continue reading this post on Patently-O....
Read Full ArticleA USPTO Docketing Change Behind the Terminal Disclaimer Collapse
Terminal disclaimers hit a 2008 low. The cause was not Cellect or Allergan but a USPTO docketing change in which applications examiners took up. Continue reading this post on Patently-O....
Read Full ArticleHow to Outsmart the Trap of Chinese Support Requirements
In a previous article, the authors showed that Chinese courts ask a different question than U.S. courts — not whether the inventor possessed what is recited in the claim, but whether the scope of th...
Read Full ArticleProf John Duffy Next USPTO General Counsel
Professor John Duffy has been offered the USPTO General Counsel post, reuniting him with Director Squires, his co-counsel from the Bilski litigation. Continue reading this post on Patently-O....
Read Full ArticleOther Barks & Bites for Friday, September 4: D.C. Circuit Affirms Medical Device TPM Circumvention; U.S. Earns High Ratings in IP Index Statistic Annex; and Microsoft Edge is Not I
This week in Other Barks & Bites: a House IP Subcommittee hearing on restoring the USPTO’s fee-setting authority turns heated over the original intention behind the America Invents Act; the Eleventh...
Read Full ArticleEn Banc: Did Ramey Appeal His Own Sanction?
Ramey seeks rehearing after the Federal Circuit held his notice of appeal never made him an appellant. His Rule 3(c)(7) argument arrives late. Continue reading this post on Patently-O....
Read Full Article
Locations
USA Cambridge Office
245 First Street 18th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02142
China Shenzhen Office
Dun Huang Mansion, Suite 6C 49 Zi Zhu Liu Road, Zhu Zi Lin, Futian District Shenzhen 518040
Admissions: Admitted in MA, CAFC, and USPTO.
Privacy Policy
Effective Date: January 26, 2026
This Privacy Policy describes how Matthias Scholl (“we,” “us,” or “our”) collects, uses, and protects information obtained through this website (the “Site”).
By using this Site, you consent to the practices described in this Policy.
1. Information We Collect
We may collect the following categories of information:
a. Information You Voluntarily Provide
You may provide personal information to us when you:
- Contact us by email or through the Site
- Submit an inquiry
- Register for an event or mailing list
- Apply for a position
This information may include your name, email address, telephone number, company name, and any information you choose to provide in your message.
b. Automatically Collected Information
When you visit the Site, we may automatically collect:
- IP address
- Browser type and operating system
- Pages viewed and time spent on the Site
- Referring website
This information is collected through cookies and similar technologies for website functionality and analytics.
2. Cookies and Analytics
We use cookies and similar technologies to operate and improve the Site.
We use Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager to:
- Measure site usage
- Understand visitor behavior
- Improve website performance
These tools may collect information such as IP address, browser type, and usage patterns. Google may use this data in accordance with its own privacy policies.
You may disable cookies through your browser settings. Please note that disabling cookies may affect the functionality of the Site.
We do not use cookies for advertising, behavioral profiling, or sale of personal data.
3. How We Use Information
We use information collected through the Site to:
- Respond to inquiries and communications
- Provide legal and professional services
- Operate and improve the Site
- Maintain security and prevent misuse
- Comply with legal and ethical obligations
We do not sell personal information.
4. Disclosure of Information
We may disclose information:
- To service providers assisting in website hosting, analytics, or IT support
- When required by law, court order, or legal process
- To protect the rights, property, or safety of the firm or others
- In connection with a business transaction (e.g., merger or reorganization)
We do not disclose personal information for marketing purposes by third parties.
5. No Attorney–Client Relationship
Use of this Site or submission of information through it does not create an attorney–client relationship. Please do not submit confidential or time-sensitive information unless an attorney–client relationship has been formally established in writing.
6. Data Security
We use reasonable administrative and technical measures to protect personal information. However, no method of transmission over the internet is completely secure, and we cannot guarantee absolute security.
7. Data Retention
We retain personal information only as long as reasonably necessary for legitimate business and legal purposes, including compliance with legal and ethical obligations.
8. External Links
This Site may contain links to third-party websites. We are not responsible for the privacy practices or content of those sites. Please review their privacy policies separately.
9. Changes to This Policy
We may update this Privacy Policy from time to time. Any changes will be posted on this page with an updated effective date. Continued use of the Site constitutes acceptance of the revised policy.
10. Contact Information
If you have questions about this Privacy Policy, you may contact us through the contact information provided on this website.
Legal Disclaimer
The information on this website is provided by Matthias Scholl for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Use of this website does not create an attorney–client relationship. An attorney–client relationship will be formed only through a written engagement agreement.
The materials on this website are not intended to address the circumstances of any particular matter, including patentability, infringement, freedom-to-operate, or other intellectual property issues. You should seek advice from a qualified attorney regarding your specific situation.
Links to third-party websites are provided for convenience only and do not constitute endorsement or approval of their content.
Contacting us by email or through this website does not create an attorney–client relationship. Please do not send confidential or sensitive information unless and until a formal engagement has been established. Electronic communications may not be secure.
If you do not receive a response from us, you should assume that we are unable to represent you and should seek legal counsel elsewhere. For assistance in locating a Massachusetts-admitted attorney, please visit: https://www.massbar.org/public/lawyer-referral-service.
This website may constitute attorney advertising under Massachusetts law. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Matthias Scholl practices law only in jurisdictions in which he is properly admitted or otherwise authorized to practice.